The decision came after two parents challenged a private school’s decision to increase fees by six per cent for the 2026/2027 academic year.
The parents argued that the school had introduced the new charges without proper consultation through a legally recognised parents’ association. They also questioned how the parents’ body was established and whether it met the requirements of the Basic Education Act.
The school rejected the claims, saying the fee increase had been approved during an Annual General Meeting held in May. The institution said parents and learners participated in the meeting and that families were informed about the revised fees about three months before the new charges took effect.
The school explained that the increase was necessary because of rising operating expenses, including staff salaries, learning materials, technology, maintenance and improvements to its facilities.
In its ruling, the court found that the parents had the right to bring the case and that their constitutional concerns could be considered.
However, the judge concluded that the school had provided evidence showing that the required process had been followed before the six per cent increase was approved.
The court therefore upheld the school’s decision and dismissed the parents’ petition. Each side was ordered to meet its own legal costs.
The ruling means private schools can review their fees, but they must comply with the applicable legal and procedural requirements when making such changes.
The case comes as parents at other private schools continue to raise concerns over rising education costs.